Penland explained to the court her work was not to include just about anything to The federal government's presentation but to evaluation what was integrated.
The decide claimed he experienced "problems over his candour" and that it could mean he had a motive to wish to be around the panel;
Then, following Cassie Ventura submitted her lawsuit a pair weeks later, Combs himself appeared to forward screenshots of texts he been given from Jane expressing she felt “exceptionally exploited, heartbroken and manipulated by you.”
The choose expressed worry Friday concerning the juror’s shifting responses during which he tried to downplay the discrepancies, and famous Monday morning the juror may perhaps have been “shading” his solutions to ensure that he was on the jury while in the higher-profile case.
He turned down arguments with the defence this disrupted the range in the jury, since the juror was changed by a white male;
Combs also appeared to send Khorram audio data files of phone calls he recorded with Jane during the quick aftermath of your Ventura lawsuit. Jane informed Combs the lawsuit explained, “like, term for term” her expertise.
“There is nothing the juror can do at this stage to put the genie back within the bottle and restore his believability,” Subramanian mentioned when issuing his ruling.
Ahead of the recess, Decide Arun Subramanian sided Along with the defense, which sought to Restrict how special agent DeLeassa Penland talks regarding the summary chart. For the reason that Penland wasn’t at these conferences — which the prosecution is suggesting had been freak-offs — she can’t make any inferences in her testimony about what the events did. She’s confined generally to looking at out the varied documents, which happen to be grouped by day.
Courtroom breaks for lunch Special agent Deleassa Penland is answering questions on vacation information showing the dates, areas and attendees at "conferences".
Following this, the prosecution referred to as two summary witnesses - witnesses who weren't associated with the investigation into Combs but are in court to summarise textual content conversations and here other knowledge, and provide context to preceding evidence And just how it relates to the charges;
Stay with us this night - we'll be back again shortly by using a round-up of The important thing times from courtroom today.
Cross-inspecting Penland about texts together with other info she reviewed for the case this afternoon, the defence hoped to indicate that Combs's previous companion and alleged target Cassie Ventura did not object to her position in his "freak off" sex periods - and was even an enthusiastic participant.
Decide Arun Subramanian shut the courtroom to debate a potential difficulty with one of the jurors. He didn't retake the bench so The difficulty for now remains unresolved, not less than publicly.
The chart monitoring alleged freak-off dates, locations and participants begins in August 2009, with the experience involving Sean Combs, Cassie Ventura and a person who went by the identify Jules. Ventura described Jules a number of moments in her testimony, describing him like a trustworthy associate while in the sex parties.
Cross-analyzing Penland, Combs's attorney Teny Geragos offered texts demonstrating the rapper and Cassie arranging dates for "freak offs" - intercourse periods with male escorts - trying to present they were being consensual.